Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise, 53 S. Ct. 320

Appeal from the Supreme Court of New York.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want ‍​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‍of a substantial federal question. Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114; Douglas v. Noble, 261 U. S. 165; Missouri ex rel. Hurwitz v. North, 271 U. S. 40, 43; Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U. S. 425, 428; Lambert v. Yellowley, 272 U. S. 581, 596; People v. Painless Parker Dentist, 85 Colo. 304, 280 U. S. 566; Miller v. State Board of Dental Examiners, 90 Colo. 193; 8 P. (2d) 699; 287 U. S. 563.

Case Details

Case Name: Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise

Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Published: Jan 23, 1933

Citations: 53 S. Ct. 320; 288 U.S. 588; No. 588

Docket Number: No. 588

Court Abbreviation: U.S.