History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dowson v. Packard
3 Cranch 66
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1826
Check Treatment

The CouRT (nem. con.) quashed the attachment, because it was made returnable at the Rules.

Mr. Redin, then moved the Court for ail attachment to bring in the defendant to answer the interrogatories contained in the bill; not having filed any other interrogatories.

The Coukt (nem. con.) granted the attachment for not answering the bill generally.

Case Details

Case Name: Dowson v. Packard
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Dec 15, 1826
Citation: 3 Cranch 66
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.