Dowson v. Packard

3 Cranch 66 | U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia | 1826

The CouRT (nem. con.) quashed the attachment, because it was made returnable at the Rules.

Mr. Redin, then moved the Court for ail attachment to bring in the defendant to answer the interrogatories contained in the bill; not having filed any other interrogatories.

The Coukt (nem. con.) granted the attachment for not answering the bill generally.