History
  • No items yet
midpage
Downtown Art Co. v. Zimmerman
1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10321
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1996
|
Check Treatment

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered March 7,1996, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff’s motion for an order precluding defendant from offering any evidence at trial to show that defendant owns or owned the assets of Soho Booking, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff’s motion in limine was an inappropriate device to obtain relief in the nature of partial summary judgment. In any event, the documents submitted by plaintiff in support of the motion raise material issues of fact, such that resolution of the question on this appeal would be inappropriate. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rubin, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Downtown Art Co. v. Zimmerman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 22, 1996
Citation: 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10321
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.