History
  • No items yet
midpage
Downey v. Nutt
19 Gratt. 59
Va.
1869
Check Treatment
Moncure, P.,

delivered the judgment of the court: The court is of opinion that for reasons stated in *61the cases of Martin v. Snowden, trustee, Bennett v. Hunter, Portner & Recker v. Cazenove, 18 Gratt. 100; and Turner v. Smith, &c., Id. 830, which'rule this case, there is no error in the said judgment. Therefore, it is considered that the same he affirmed, and that the defendant recover of the plaintiff thirty dollars damages, and also his costs by him about his defence in this behalf expended; which is ordered to be certified, &c.

Erras, J., dissented.

Judgment appirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Downey v. Nutt
Court Name: Supreme Court of Virginia
Date Published: Feb 13, 1869
Citation: 19 Gratt. 59
Court Abbreviation: Va.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.