History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dowd v. Pinto
49 A.D.3d 264
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2008
|
Check Treatment

Although it is well settled that the determination of a guardian’s fee (SCPA 405 [1]) is within the sound discretion of the Surrogate (Matter of Hassett, 47 AD2d 569, 570 [1975]), the *265brief and conclusory decision herein lacks any indication as to the factors considered by the Surrogate and the weight given to each (Matter of Burk, 6 AD2d 429 [1958]; cf. Matter of Schneider, 24 AD3d 225 [2005]). Without this, we are unable to render meaningful review of the compensation granted. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Williams, Sweeny, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Dowd v. Pinto
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 4, 2008
Citation: 49 A.D.3d 264
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.