18 A. 317 | N.H. | 1889
1. The election of the executor to testify was a waiver of the defendants' exception to the competency of the plaintiff's precedent testimony (Eastman v. Amoskeag Co.,
2. Dow's letter was properly admitted to contradict the executor. The objection to its admission taken at the trial was general and not special; and to a general objection to evidence the only question is, whether it is admissible for any purpose. Wyman v. Perkins,
3. Dow being a competent witness as to the ownership of the colt, this exception has of course no validity.
Exceptions overruled.
CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred.