History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dow v. King
52 Ark. 282
Ark.
1889
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Pleading. The interplea is bad whether the original action against the railway was for the conversion of the mule, or for damages for injury done it. In the former case it should have alleged a satisfaction of the judgment recovered for the conversion (Cooley on Torts, 338), and in the latter event the interpleaders had no claim to the property at all.

Affirm.

Case Details

Case Name: Dow v. King
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Nov 15, 1889
Citation: 52 Ark. 282
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.