History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dover v. Reynolds
245 Ind. 33
Ind.
1963
Check Treatment

*34On Petition To Transfer

Myers, J.

— This case, comes to us on petition to transfer. We concur in the opinion of the Appellate Court with the exception that it uses the case of State ex rel. Brosman v. Whitley Circuit Court et al. (1963), 186 N. E. 2d 881, as authority to support the proposition that when an answer is filed to a complaint the issues are closed. While the general proposition of law expressed in the Appellate Court’s opinion is correct (see Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, page 964 et seq., “issue”), the foregoing case cannot be cited as authority because this court has granted a petition for rehearing generally, and the case is before the court as if it had never been decided. Booher et al. v. Goldsborough et al. (1873), 44 Ind. 490; Bally et al. v. Guilford Twy. School Corp., etc. (1955), 234 Ind. 273, 126 N. E. 2d 13.

Petition to transfer denied.

Landis, C. J., and Achor and Arterburn, JJ., concur. Jackson, J., concurs in result.

Note. — Reported in 196 N. E. 2d 76.

Case Details

Case Name: Dover v. Reynolds
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 12, 1963
Citation: 245 Ind. 33
Docket Number: No. 19,583
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.