History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dovale v. Ackerman
24 Abb. N. Cas. 214
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1890
Check Treatment
O’Brien, J.

If there was no dispute as to items of costs, the plaintiff, having succeeded in the action, would have been entitled to costs as of course. As a condition of being allowed to amend, plaintiff paid the term fees, etc., to defendants. Is it not clear that, if not allowed to tax these now, plaintiff has paid double costs for the amendment, viz., those actually paid to defendants, and those which the clerk has decided cannot be taxed against defendants because heretofore paid to the latter? The motion to retax granted, and the exceptions on appeal from the clerk’s taxation allowed.

Case Details

Case Name: Dovale v. Ackerman
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 3, 1890
Citation: 24 Abb. N. Cas. 214
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.