198 Wis. 445 | Wis. | 1929
The principal contention of the defendant here is that if the plaintiff found the title unsatisfactory he could do one of three things:
“(a) Elect to perform the contract arid take a conveyance relying on the covenant in the deed as security against any defects in the title.
“(b) Elect to refuse to perform the contract and receive back the earnest money.
“(c) Elect to have an amount abated from the purchase price for the deficiency of title.”
The principal argument of the defendant is directed to the proposition that a court of equity will not require a de
By the Court. — The order is affirmed.