4 Cal. 304 | Cal. | 1854
delivered the opinion of the Court.
There are two errors assigned by the-, appellant in this ' cause, which are both well taken.
The first is the order of the Court below, admitting the
The second is, that the Court erred in restricting the operation of the 80th section of the “Act Defining the Manner of Commencing Civil Actions,” to natural persons.
The word “person,” in its legal signification, is a generic term, and was intended to include artificial as well as natural persons.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.