Douglas v. State, 627 So. 2d 30

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and the order placing him on probation following his plea of nolo contendere. We strike that portion of the judgment which requires payments to the “Court Improvement Fund” and “Hillsborough County Drug Fund,” without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition of these non-statutory costs after proper notice to appellant. See, e.g., Alfonso v. State, 595 So.2d 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

FRANK, C.J., and DANAHY and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Douglas v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Nov 10, 1993

Citations: 627 So. 2d 30; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11439; 1993 WL 461957; No. 93-00183

Docket Number: No. 93-00183

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.