History
  • No items yet
midpage
Douglas v. Collins
196 N.E. 577
NY
1935
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ. CRANE, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ., concur on the ground that the motion should not have been entertained under rule 107, subdivision 9. *Page 559

Case Details

Case Name: Douglas v. Collins
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 30, 1935
Citation: 196 N.E. 577
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.