Douglas County v. Kountze, 84 Neb. 506

Douglas County v. Kountze

84 Neb. 506 | Neb. | 1909

Lead Opinion

Root, J.

On the 20th day of November, 1906, Herman Kountze departed uiis life a resident of and domiciled in the city *507of Omaha. His estate was administered in said county and an inheritance tax paid in conformity with the laws of Nebraska upon all property which his representatives concede was subject thereto. In September, 1907, the county of Douglas applied to the county judge for the appointment of an appraiser to the end that a tax might be levied upon the succession to certain other property claimed to be subject to said tax. Charles T. Kountze, a son of the deceased, filed objections, and alleged therein that on the 15th day of August, 1904, Herman Kountze executed a certain writing as follows: “Know all men by these presents: That Herman Kountze of the city of Omaha, county of Douglas, and state of Nebraska, for a good and valuable consideration, does hereby sell, transfer, assign, set over and deliver unto Augustus F. Kountze of the city, county and state of New York, but in trust, however, for the persons and purposes hereinafter named and as hereinafter set forth, all and signular the bonds, shares of stock and personal property hereinafter described, and all and singular the right, title, interest and ownership of Herman Kountze in and to any and all thereof. * * * Said Augustus F. Kountze shall as trustee during the continuance of the trust have, hold, manage, and control all of said bonds, shares of stock and personal property and the increment of any and all thereof and all proceeds or other property coming from any sales, exchanges or reinvestments of any or all thereof, with the rights and powers concerning and for the uses and persons as follows: He shall at all times have and is hereby given the full right, power and authority to manage, act with reference to and upon, any and all of the same so as to most advantageously serve, care for and preserve the trust property in accordance with his best judgment; but he shall at no time sell, exchange, incumber, or in anywise dispose of any part of the trust property without the written consent of said Herman Kountze. At no time shall said Augustus F. Kountze be liable to any person whomsoever for any loss occasioned through *508error or judgment. Said Augustus F. Kountze as trustee shall pay to said Herman Kountze, during the lifetime of said Herman Kountze, for his own use and enjoyment, and when and as received by said Augustus F. Kountze, any and all incomes of the trust property and any and all distributions as dividends or otherwise that may be at any time made by any corporation or concern in which any shares of stock or interests are held by said Augustus F. Kountze as trustee. ' Upon the death of said Herman Kountze the trust shall end, and said Augustus F. Kountze as trustee,or his successor in the trust,shall thereupon close the trust and make distribution of the property of the trust estate, in kind so far as may be practicable, and if impracticable to distribute in kind then he may reduce so much of the property to money as he may deem necessary and make distribution thereof, to the following persons and in the following portions: To Clara Sarah Kountze, the wife of said Herman Kountze, one-seventh of all thereof, provided she be living at the time of the death of said Herman Kountze; to Augustus F. Kountze and Charles T. Kountze in trust for Eugenie Kountze Nicholson one-seventh of all thereof; to Augustus F. Kountze one-seventh of all thereof; to Charles T. Kountze one-seventh of all thereof; to Herman D. Kountze one-seventh of all thereof; to Luther L. Kountze one-seventh of all thereof; to Charles T. Kountze and Luther L. Kountze in trust for Gertrude Kountze Stewart one-seventh of all thereof. Should Clara Sarah Kountze die before said Herman Kountze the one-seventh which would be hers should she survive said Herman Kountze shall go and belong to such persons, and in such portions, as would in the event of her death before the death of Herman Kountze take the one-seventh of the residue of the personal property of Herman Kountze which he may bequeath to her in his last will and testament. Said Augustus F. Kountze and Charles T. Kountze shall hold the one-seventh which shall pass to them hereunder as trustees for Eugenie Kountze Nicholson for such time *509and with powers and duties concerning exactly similar to the time and powers and duties concerning the portion of the residue of the property of said Herman Kountze which, in his last will and testament, he may provide shall go to trustees for her; and if in his last will and testament said Herman Kountze does not provide that trustees shall take any part of his property for Eugenie Kountze Nicholson then Augustus F. Kountze as trustee hereunder, or his successor in the trust, shall deliver one-seventh of the trust property referred to herein to Eugenie Kountze Nicholson direct, and she shall have the same freed from any trust. Said Charles T. Kountze and Luther L. Kountze shall hold the one-seventh which shall pass to them hereunder as trustees for Gertrude Kountze Stewart, for such time and with powers and duties concerning exactly similar to the time and powers and duties concerning the portion of the residue of the property of said Herman Kountze which, in his last will and testament, he may provide shall go to trustees for her; and if in his last will and testament said Herman Kountze does not provide that trustees shall take any part of his property for Gertrude Kountze Stewart then Augustus F. Kountze as trustee hereunder, or his successor in the trust, shall deliver one-seventh of the trust property referred to herein to Gertrude Kountze Stewart direct, and she shall have the same freed from any trust. In the event of the death of either Augustus F. Kountze or Charles T. Kountze before or after the death of Herman Kountze, or in the event that either of them should be unwilling or incompetent to act, then Herman 1). Kountze or Luther L. Kountze, being willing and competent to act, in the order named, shall with reference to the trust for Eugenie Kountze Nicholson become the successory trustee; and in the event of the death of either Charles T. Kountze or Luther L. Kountze before or after the death of Herman Kountze, or in the event that either of them should be unwilling or incompetent to act, then Augustus F.' Kountze or Herman D. Kountze, being willing and com*510petent to act, in the order named, shall with reference to the trust for Gertrude Kountze Stewart become the «accessory trustee; the purpose being that there shall be two trustees for each trust, but that if at any time only one of said mentioned four be living and willing and competent to act the survivor or one willing and competent to act shall be sole trustee for each trust. If all of said mentioned four should die during the continuance of the trusts the same shall end. If either Eugenie Kountze Nicholson, Augustus F. Kountze, Charles T. Kountze, Herman I). Kountze, Luther L. Kountze, or Gertrude Kountze Stewart should die before the death of Herman Kountze then the one-seventh of the trust property herein which would have gone to the one dying had he or she survived said Herman Kountze, shall go to such persons' and in such portions and manner as may be provided in the last will and testament of said Herman Kountze for the passing of the one-seventh of the residue of the property of said Herman Kountze devised and bequeathed to the one so dying. In the event that Augustus F. Kountze should die before the death of Herman Kountze, or before performing all of his duties as trustee hereunder, or should resign or become incompetent to act, then Herman D. Kountze, Charles T. Kountze or Luther L. Kountze being willing and competent to act, in the order named, shall become the successory trustee; and should the trust hereunder devolve upon either Herman D. Kountze, Charles T. Kountze or Luther L. Kountze and the one upon whom the trust devolves should die or become incompetent then the eldest of said persons surviving and willing and competent to act shall become the trustee; and the trust hereby created concerning the property herein described shall never fail for want of a trustee. In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand in the city of Omaha, county of Douglas, and state of Nebraska, on this 15th day of August, A. D. one thousand nine hundred and four (1904). Herman Kountze. In the presence of Isaac E. Congdon.”

*511Said instrument was executed in Omaha, where Herman Kountze then resided and was domiciled: The trustee accepted said trust in said city and there received the stocks and bonds in said deed of trust described. No money or property passed between the settlor and the trustee in consideration of said trust. The trustee was then, and at all times thereafter has continued to be, a resident of the city of New York, and, contemporaneous with his acceptance of said trust, took actual possession of said securities and transferred them to New York, where they have since remained. The securities are intact, but the dividends accruing thereon have been collected and were paid Herman Kountze during his lifetime. All of said beneficiaries are in life and of full age. Eugenie Kountze Nicholson is a resident of Indiana, where she resided in 1904. Augustus P. Kountze and Herman D. Kountze then resided and have continued to reside in the state of New York, and the remaining beneficiaries reside in Nebraska and so resided in 1904. Said trustee, acting on legal advice, submitted said property to the authorities of the state of New York and paid an inheritance tax assessed thereon by said officials, but refuses to concede such right to the authorities of Nebraska. The trustee refuses to distribute the securities at any place other than New York. Said stocks and bonds were issued by corporations organized in states other than Nebraska, except the stock of the United Real Estate and Trust Company, which is a Nebraska corporation. The county demurred to said showing, and its demurrer was sustained. The trustee elected to stand upon his answer, which was dismissed and an appraiser appointed. The trustee gave bond and appealed to the district court. No pleadings seem to have been filed therein, but the court evidently acted upon and sustained the demurrer filed in the county court and confirmed its order. The trustee appeals to this court.

Counsel for the respective litigants have filed interesting briefs and made instructive arguments concerning the *512jurisdiction of the taxing authorities to levy an inheritance or succession tax upon the respective beneficiaries under the deed of trust. It is not proper to, nor will we, determine all of those questions.' We are inclined to question the right of the trustee to appeal from the order made, for the reason that it did not necessarily prejudice him nor those whose rights he is defending. In any event, we shall go no further than to ascertain whether, under the facts in this case, it appears that the succession to any of the gifts made in the deed of settlement exhibited by the trustee is subject to said tax. The interests transferred to the beneficiaries under the deed were intended to take effect as to enjoyment by all of said beneficiaries, and as to possession by some of them, upon the death of the settlor, and are within the plain meaning of section 11201, Ann. St. 1907. To the argument of the trustee that at the time of the settlor’s death all of said property was permanently located outside the limits and without the jurisdiction of the state of Nebraska, it may be said that the property represented by 5,224 shares of the capital stock of the United Real Estate and Trust Company, a Nebraska corporation, Avds for the purposes of said-act within this state, and title thereto can only be transferred by virtue of the Iuavs thereof. The complete devolution of said title must take place under the protection and according to the laws of Nebraska, and that succession is subject to the inheritance tax. Neilson v. Russell, 69 Atl. (N. J.) 476; Gardiner v. Carter, 74 N. H. 507, 69 Atl. 939. It will also be observed that the interests of the beneficiaries Eugenie Kountze Nicholson and Gertrude Kountze Stewart cannot be absolutely ascertained from a consideration of the deed of settlement, because the settlor therein reserves the right to limit in his will the terms upon which they may enjoy his bounty. The record does not disclose whether Herman Kountze made a will or not. If he did and therein exercised the right which he reserved in the deed of settlement, then said beneficiaries must trace their succession through said will and by grace *513of the laws of Nebraska, and that devolution is subject to the inheritance tax.

It is argued that, as the beneficiaries have paid one inheritance tax in New York, equity and good conscience dictate that a second burden should not be laid in Nebraska. The question presented is not one of general equities, but of jurisdiction. It has been held, and logically, that the taxing authorities must be controlled solely by the laws of the state, and not by proceedings in another and distinct jurisdiction, to ascertain whether or not a certain tax should be levied or collected. Payment in the one state is not a defense when called upon to pay in the other, unless so provided by law. Mann v. Carter, 74 N. H. 345, 68 Atl. 130; Blackstone v. Miller, 188 U. S. 189.

The county court was right in appointing an appraiser. The district court ruled properly in sustaining that appointment, and its judgment is

Affirmed.

Concurrence Opinion

Letton, J.,

concurring.

While I concur in the opinion, I seriously doubt whether the appeal was not prematurely taken. The statute provides for the appointment of an appraiser upon the application of any interested party who shall give notice to such persons as the county judge may by order direct of the time and place of the appraisement, and may compel attendance of witnesses and take evidence under oath concerning the property and the value thereof, and provides further for reporting the same to the county judge, who shall fix and determine the value of the property and the tax to which the same is liable. It provides further for an appeal to the county court by any person or persons dissatisfied. I think the proper practice would have been for the parties interested to wait until they were injured by some order or judgment before thev sought to review the same. This is the view taken as to the manner *514of procedure, in New York. In re Astor’s Estate, 6 Dem. Sur. (N. Y.) 402, 2 N. Y. Supp. 630; In re Estate of Ullmann, 137 N. Y. 403, 33 N. E. 480.