History
  • No items yet
midpage
Doughty v. McMillan
96 Ga. 752
Ga.
1895
Check Treatment
Atkinson, J.

Where the trial judge, in his charge to the jury, while giving certain instructions as to admissions, inadvertently used the name of a witness, where he intended to use the name of another person not a witness, and granted a new trial upon the ground that the jury might have been misled by such confusion of names, this court will not control his discretion in granting a new trial, unless the verdict be demanded by the evidence. In this case the evidence being conflicting, the discretion of the judge in granting a new trial will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed..

Case Details

Case Name: Doughty v. McMillan
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 1, 1895
Citation: 96 Ga. 752
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.