| NY | Nov 5, 1847

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *81

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *82 After deliberation, the Court (GARDINER, J. dissenting) affirmed the judgment of the Supreme Court, for the same reasons, substantially, which were assigned by that Court in rendering its judgment. (See 3 Denio 598.) *83

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.