History
  • No items yet
midpage
Doucet v. Fontenot
278 U.S. 561
SCOTUS
1928
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted for the reason that under § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February. 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937),. the case is not properly before this Court on writ of .error. There is, -however, a federal question, as shown by Wadkins v. Producers Oil Co., 227 U. S. 368, and McCune v. Essig, 199 U. S. 382. and the proper method o.f review would be by application for a writ of certiorari. Treating the writ of error aá an application for certiorari the same is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Doucet v. Fontenot
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 22, 1928
Citation: 278 U.S. 561
Docket Number: No. 113
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.