History
  • No items yet
midpage
Double Eagle Lubricants, Inc. v. Texas
384 U.S. 434
SCOTUS
1966
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Swift & Co., Inc. v. Wickham, 382 U. S. 111, and Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm’n v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 382 U. S. 281.

Case Details

Case Name: Double Eagle Lubricants, Inc. v. Texas
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 6, 1966
Citation: 384 U.S. 434
Docket Number: 1177
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.