Dotlea Realty Corp. v. Abrams
175 Misc. 591
City of New York Municipal Cou...
1940
Check Treatment
Evans, J.

The mere fact that the judgment debtor earns a salary somewhat above the level of the amount exempted from the process of garnishee by section 684 of the Civil Practice Act, is not of itself sufficient reasoi. for ordering the judgment debtor to pay, under section 793, the same amount weekly as the judgment creditor could obtain by garnishee. Sections 684 and 793 have different origins, and different social purposes behind them. Under the former it makes no difference whether the judgment debtor will be able to furnish his family bare necessities or not, after the garnishee is levied. The amount earned determines the right to *592the garnishee and nothing more. No 'court has any right to interfere with the legislative mandate. But, under the latter section, it is the ability of the judgment debtor to spare a sum beyond the real necessities of his family which sum the court may apply to the judgment. A judge must, therefore, determine that and not merely say that because the Legislature fixed twelve dollars weekly as the minimum of bare necessity, the court must adhere to that regardless of the facts.

At bar we have a worker employed by the Works Progress Administration earning twenty-two dollars weekly and with a wife and two small children. I do not see how he can spare anything from that.

Motion denied, with leave to renew upon a showing that the debtor’s financial condition has improved.