Doscher v. Vanderbilt

177 A.D. 813 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1917

Laughlin, J.:

The Teachers’ Mutual Life Assurance Association, a voluntary unincorporated association, consisting of more than seven members, was organized in May, 1869. Margaret Doscher, who was one of the original members, died on the 26th day of April, 1915, having performed all obligations and paid all assessments which she was called upon by said association to perform and pay until her death.

. Article 7 of the by-laws of the association provided for the payment upon the death of a member of $500 to the assignee of the member. The plaintiff was the duly designated assignee of the decedent, and she brought this action against the president of the association under section 1919 of the Code of Civil Procedure to recover said death benefit.

The pleadings were oral. The plaintiff merely alleged generally a liability under said by-law. The answer was a general denial with the defense that the association has been dissolved and gone out of existence.

A preamble to the constitution provided that the object of the association to be formed was “ to give to each and every member * * * the opportunity to leave at death, to a properly designated assignee, a sum hereinafter to be named, ” and said section of the by-laws fixed the sum as stated.' Article 4 of the by-laws, from the inception of the organization, provided as follows: “ Upon receiving from the Treasurer notice of the decease of a member, the Financial Secretary shall notify each Ward Collector of such death, and of the levy of an assessment of fifty (50) cents to be collected from each surviving member by the several Department Collectors.

“ The money in excess of five hundred dollars ($500) shall be allowed to accumulate, and whenever it shall amount to one thousand and twenty dollars ($1,020) there shall be no call for assessment on the occurrence of a death.”

Article 2 provided that the members should make “ all proper provision to meet the prompt payment of assessments as they are levied.” Article 3 provided that the membership of any person failing to pay an assessment should be forfeited ipso facto, and that he should be given notice thereof; but that where a membership was thus forfeited or any member “resigned ” he might be reinstated as therein provided. . There is no other provision in the constitution or by-laws relating to the termination of a membership in the organization. The by-laws provided for the election of a collector by the members in each department into which the organization was divided, and that the collectors should elect ward collectors who should constitute a board of managers, who should have power “to choose their officers, to remove derelict or unfaithful collectors, and to make, alter, amend, or abolish by-laws ns they may see fit.” The officers provided for by the by-laws were a president, vice-president, recording secretary, financial secretary and treasurer. The defendant became the president of the association in 1911. Thereafter the membership diminished through many deaths of the older members and resignations of younger members and the inability to obtain new members. On the 30th of November, 1914, a letter was sent to all of the members by the chairman of a special committee, which evidently had been considering what it was advisable for the association to do in the circumstances by which it was confronted with financial disaster. The letter stated, in substance, that the board of managers had determined that it was advisable and necessary to discontinue the present plan of death benefits, and that a plan had been negotiated with the Travelers Insurance Company by which all members under sixty-five years of age could be insured by that company for the amount of death benefit provided by the by-laws of the association at a cost much lower than a policy could be obtained from the insurance company by any individual and at lower cost than assessments in the organization; that members of sixty-five years of age and upwards could obtain a policy in smaller amounts stated at less than their assessments; that the benefits prescribed by the by-laws of the association would lapse and become ineffective on a date to be fixed by the board of managers, and it was suggested that members apply to the insurance company in accordance with the plan thus negotiated. Thereafter and on the 20th day of January, 1915, a notice in writing, signed by the president and recording secretary, was mailed to each member of the association, inviting them all to attend a meeting to be held on the thirtieth day of the month to take action along the lines recommended in said circular letter of November thirtieth. This notice stated quite fully and clearly the circumstances which led the managers to believe that it was impossible to continue the payment of death benefits by the association; and, in substance, that it was intended to pay all accrued death claims and liabilities of the association, and to eliminate from the constitution and by-laws the death benefit provisions, and to continue the fraternal features of the association. At that time the membership numbered between 1,300 and 1,400. The meeting called was attended by more than 200, but the decedent, although duly notified, did not attend, or, so far as appears, send any communication.

At that meeting a resolution, the object of which is not apparent, was adopted, providing that no ward collector should ‘ ‘ dismiss from membership, any member whose name was on the roll, Dec. 1, 1914,” and thereupon, after full and free discussion, a preamble and resolution was adopted as follows:

“Whereas, it is the judgment of our officers and managers that this association is not upon a safe, sound and enduring basis as respects its benefit or insurance features, and that to secure to the surviving members thereof and to those who may hereafter join this organization certain definite insurance benefits that this organization be reorganized, and that the members concur therein, and

‘ ‘ Whereas, with respect to such insurance it is the j udgment of all that this organization be reorganized into a group of insured having relations with The Travelers Insurance Company.

“ Now, therefore, be it Resolved, a quorum of the board of managers of this organization being present and concurring therein that the benefits of all living members in this organization be and they are hereby terminated and are hereby declared to have lapsed and become ineffective as of this 30th day of January, 1915, and be it further

“Resolved, that this association be continued only for the purpose of collecting from the members and distributing to the assigns of deceased members any death benefits that may have accrued and remain unpaid.”

Thereupon another resolution was adopted providing for the auditing of the books and the termination of the liability of all fiscal officers and agents on the payment of accrued death benefits, and on their accounting in accordance with the audit. The meeting thereupon adjourned sine die.

At the close of that meeting those in attendance formed the “ Teachers’ Group Insurance Association of Greater Hew York,” for membership in which 483 applications had been received. The decedent refused to join the new association.

On the 1st of January, 1915, an assessment of nine dollars had been levied against each member to cover eighteen death claims, which had accrued prior to that time. That assessment was payable in installments of two dollars monthly for four months, and one dollar for the fifth month. At the time of the death of decedent four dollars remained unpaid on this assessment, but it was paid on the thirteenth day of May thereafter, and it is not claimed that she had not paid the assessment to the extent that it had become due.

The plaintiff demanded payment of the death claim and on April 29, 1915, the secretary of the association, upon whom her demand was made, replied, stating that the association had been disbanded and that death claims of members dying after January thirtieth could not be considered by the old association. Ho other assessment was levied by the association. Ho evidence was offered with respect to the amount collected on the last assessment or with respect to the application thereof to the payment of death claims accruing prior to the end of January, 1915. It was shown, however, that at the time of the trial the sum of about eighty-six dollars was in the treasury.

It appears that the defendant was present at the meeting on January thirtieth, and that he joined and became chairman of the new organization. It is fairly to be inferred, therefore, that he not only acquiesced in but favored the action taken at that meeting. It would seem, therefore, that he withdrew from the old organization and necessarily ceased to be president thereof, at least excepting during the period for closing its affairs in accordance with the resolution. Interesting points have been argued on this appeal with respect to whether the officers of the association, including the defendant, who joined the new association ceased to be such and as to whether the association by the action taken has not been legally dissolved and as to whether in any event the death benefit by-law thereof has not been lawfully abolished by the vote of a quorum of the board of managers; but it is, I think, unnecessary to discuss or to decide those questions. The action was brought and the recovery was had and is sought to be sustained, not upon the theory that it is to recover property in which the members are interested jointly or in common, but solely upon the theory of a contractual obligation created by the constitution and by-laws to pay a death benefit of $500 upon which all the members of the association are jointly or severally liable. It may be that if it were alleged and shown that the association had on hand funds collected by assessments to pay this death claim or otherwise available therefor, which should have been paid over to the plaintiff — the action would lie to recover such property on the theory that it was received and held for the use of the plaintiff. Such, however, is not this case. It appears that no assessment was levied for this death benefit, and while it was shown that the association had in the hands of its treasurer about $86 it was not shown that it was' available for payment on this claim or that the plaintiff was entitled thereto. Some stress is laid in the opinion of the Appellate Term on the fact that there was some money in the treasury, but the learned counsel for the respondent does not claim that the action was brought to. recover any property to which the plaintiff claims ownership or to be entitled. His sole contention .is that the action is predicated on the contract to recover the amount of the death benefit for which all the members are jointly and severally liable. On that theory there can be no recovery unless the individual members ai’e so liable, for with the possible exception of an action to recover property, which exception, however, the Court of Appeals in construing section 1919 of the Code of Civil Procedure has not recognized, no action can be maintained under that section unless the members of the association could have been held liable either jointly or severally on the cause of action without first bringing an action against the association and may be held liable jointly and severally for any balance not realized on an execution against the personal property of the association. (McCabe v. Goodfellow, 133 N. Y. 89; Schouten v. Alpine, 215 id. 225, 232; People ex rel. Solomon v. Brotherhood of Painters, 218 id. 115, 123.) The by-law providing for a death benefit of $500 is to be construed with the by-law prescribing the duty of the members to contribute thereto. The former has no greater binding force than the latter.* The individual liability of the members was clearly limited to an assessment of fifty cents for each death. The contention of the learned counsel for the respondent is that the by-law with respect to the death benefit constitutes a contract between the association and the beneficiary upon which all the members are jointly and severally hable for the entire amount, and the by-law relating to the assessments merely constitutes an internal regulation between those liable by which they contemplated that a sufficient fund would thereby be provided, and that even if the liability to the plaintiff contemplated an assessment the members are liable jointly and severally for the failure of the officers to levy and collect the assessment. Authorities are cited in which societies and associations have been held liable on that theory; but the actions were on policies or certificates issued by corporations where there was and could b.e no joint or several liability of the members. (See Stewart v. Thorburn, 171 App. Div. 258; Ayers v. Order of United Workmen, 188 N. Y. 280; Wright v. Knights of Maccabees, 196 id. 391; Freeman v. National Benefit Society, 42 Hun, 252; O’Brien v. Home Benefit Society, 117 N. Y. 310.) • In the case at bar it is perfectly plain, I think, that those who drafted the constitution and by-laws of the association and organized and joined it did not intend, as is claimed by respondent, to become jointly and severally liable to each beneficiary for the entire amount of the death benefit. The provision for the reinstatement of members who resigned recognized the right of any member to resign at will; and the only penalty prescribed for the failure to pay an assessment was forfeiture of membership. These provisions are inconsistent with a contractual liability on the part of each member to beneficiaries for the whole amount of the death benefits which would continue the association, unless it were dissolved by unanimous consent, possibly until a particular beneficiary was the last member who had not resigned or whose membership had not been forfeited for non-payment of an assessment. This was in a strict sense a voluntary association, not for engaging in business or with any expectation of profit, but for the mutual benefit of the members so long as they remained such in the form of death benefits to be paid from a fund voluntarily contributed by the members in paying assessments levied against them, but with no contractual obligation on the part of the members either jointly or severally to the beneficiaries of deceased members. (See Cochran v. Boleman, 162 Ind. 669; 65 L. R A. 516.)

It follows, therefore, that the determination of the Appellate Term' and the judgment of the Municipal Court should be reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs of the appeal in each court and of the trial.

Clarke, P. J., Scott, Davis and Shearn, JJ., concurred.

Determination and judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Doscher v. Vanderbilt

Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date Published: Apr 5, 1917

Citation: 177 A.D. 813

Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.