Case Information
*1 United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED May 15, 2018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT David J. Bradley, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
DORCAS-JEDI & ASSOCIATES LIMITED, §
§
Plaintiff, § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-2374
VS. § §
DIVINE EDLEN USA, LLC, NORDANA §
USA INC., CITIBANK NATIONAL §
ASSOCIATION, DIAMOND BANK PLC., §
§
Defendants. §
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
Pending before the Court is Defendant Nordana (USA), Inc.’s (“Nordana”) [1] Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23), arguing that Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the applicable limitations period, and the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. 26), recommending that Nordana’s Motion be granted. Plaintiff has not, to this date, filed a response to Defendant Nordana’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and no objections have been filed by any party to the Memorandum and Recommendation.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed by any party, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record to accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc. , 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2008).
After carefully reviewing the record and the applicable law, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge, who has correctly cited and applied the law to the facts here that are supported by the uncontroverted summary judgment evidence.
Accordingly, the Court hereby *2 ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. 26) as its own and
ORDERS that Defendant Nordana (USA), Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is GRANTED and that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Nordana (USA), Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this 15th day of May, 2018.
___________________________________ MELINDA HARMON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 / 2
[1] Nordana is now known as Weco USA, Inc. 1 / 2