History
  • No items yet
midpage
Doran v. Brown
16 Wash. 703
Wash.
1897
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The respondent moves to strike the appellants’ brief for the reason that no assignment of errors appears therein. This motion must be sustained. There seems to be no attempt whatever to make an assignment of errors in appellants’ brief. Abstract law propositions are discussed, but it is impossible to determine from such discussion whether the discussion applies to the case tried or not. The brief is more faulty in this respect than was that in the case of Haugh v. Tacoma, 12 Wash. 386 (41 Pac. 173), where the brief of appellant was stricken for the reason that there were no assignments of error made therein. Appellants’ brief will, therefore, be stricken and the judgment appealed from affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Doran v. Brown
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 12, 1897
Citation: 16 Wash. 703
Docket Number: No. 2512
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.