History
  • No items yet
midpage
Doolin v. Ward
6 Johns. 194
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1810
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The contract declared on was without consideration and void. It was also against public policy, and tended injuriously to affect the character and the value of sales at auction. The judgment below must be reversed.

Van Ness, J. said he concurred in the opinion of the court on the single point, that this was a nudum pactum.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Doolin v. Ward
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1810
Citation: 6 Johns. 194
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.