History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dooley v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. of Pennsylvania
131 N.J. Eq. 468
| N.J. | 1942
|
Check Treatment

The decree under review is affirmed, for the reasons expressed by Vice-Chancellor Egan in his opinion reported in 130 N.J. Eq. 75.

In the opinion, however, the learned Vice-Chancellor discusses the question of the right of John J. Buckley, general chairman of the System Board of Adjustment of the Brotherhood and of the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, c., itself to represent the clerks as bargaining agent with the employer Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. This question we do not consider necessary to the determination of the case and we consequently express no opinion thereon.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Dooley v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. of Pennsylvania
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 5, 1942
Citation: 131 N.J. Eq. 468
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.