A judgmеnt for money was rendered in favor of certain parties and against a part of the defendants in this cause, not necessary to enumerate, and in the proceeding a decree of foreclosure of a lien on lаnd was rendered against all parties, among whom were the appellаnts Ren-nell and the Childress Loan & Investment Company. No money judgment was rendered against them, and the bond on appeal executed by them partakes to some extent of the nature of a cost bond, under Rev. St. 1911, art. 2097, has some of the attributes of a supersedeas bond, provided by article 2101, and is further conditioned under article 2102, also providing for a supersedeas, where the judgment is fоr the recovery of, land or- other property, in effect that apрellants will pay, if the judgment is affirmed, the value of the rent or hire of the proрerty in any suit which may be brought therefor. The nominal penalty in the bond is the sum of $300, which is twice the probable amount of the costs, fixed by the clerk for the apрeal of the case, instead of double the amount of the money judgment rеndered in the case; but it also stipulates that the appellants shall pеrform the judgment of. the appellate courts, if rendered against them, and рay all such damages as may be awarded against them, likewise the value of the rent or hire of the property as stated.
The motion to dismiss is sustained, with the right to appellants under the statute to prepare and file a sufficient bond within 15 days from the date оf this order.
®^>For other oases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
