790 N.Y.S.2d 11 | N.Y. App. Div. | 2005
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered September 18, 2003, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Although plaintiffs alleged that the various parties involved in prosecuting the case were motivated by bad faith, they failed to substantiate their allegations with clear, admissible evidence. Nor does the omission of entries in certain sections of CWA-OFS Form W-736A warrant a different conclusion, since a review of the comments that were entered by the caseworker shows she provided sufficient detail and narrative for the investigation. The fact that the caseworker contemplated altering a medical document, for the likely purpose of redacting certain details, does not create an inference that she acted in bad faith when interviewing plaintiffs’ family. Furthermore, the acts of the prosecuting attorney, who allegedly defamed plaintiffs, are protected by absolute immunity (Levy v State of New York, 58 NY2d 733, 734 [1982]; see Imbler v Pachtman, 424 US 409 [1976]).
We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P, Andrias, Friedman, Sullivan and Nardelli, JJ.