History
  • No items yet
midpage
Donohue v. Rosenthal
147 Or. 408
Or.
1934
Check Treatment

In Banc. AFFIRMED. This suit challenges the constitutionality of certain parts of chapter 166, Oregon Laws, 1933, regulating advertising by dentists. It is a companion case of Semler v. Oregon State Boardof Dental Examiners. All the contentions made by appellant herein have been decided adversely to him in the Semler case.

It follows that the decree dismissing this suit is affirmed. Defendants are entitled to costs and disbursements.

ROSSMAN, J., not sitting.

CAMPBELL, J., concurs in the result. *Page 409

Case Details

Case Name: Donohue v. Rosenthal
Court Name: Oregon Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 6, 1934
Citation: 147 Or. 408
Court Abbreviation: Or.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.