Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdic*532tion upon the. authority of (1) section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726 ; (2) United States v. Lanza, 260 U.S. 377" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1922-12-11" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/united-states-v-lanza-100077?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="100077">260 U. S. 377, 382; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1908-11-09" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/twining-v-new-jersey-96885?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="96885">211 U. S. 78, 93; Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Pet. 243" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1833-02-16" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/barron-ex-rel-tiernan-v-mayor-of-baltimore-85827?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="85827">7 Pet. 243.
Messrs. Herbert E. Holmes and E. N.- Pike for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. Bansford W. Shaw and Edward W. Wheeler for defendant in error.