Donnelly v. Staten Island Shipbuilding Co.

Order in so far as appealed from modified by denying the motion to strike out the fifth and ninth defenses, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. The complaint seeks to piece out a common-law action with the aid of such provisions of the Employers’ Liability Act^* as constituted under the common law the negligence of a fellow-servant. This cannot be done. (Collelli v. Turner, 215 N. Y. 675.) We cannot say from the complaint whether plaintiff relies upon the common law or the statute, and under the circumstances the fifth defense should be permitted to stand until plaintiff develops his case on the trial. We think the seventh defense was properly stricken out as a mere conclusion of law. The ninth defense should not have been stricken out, as the matter was properly pleaded in mitigation. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Maiming and Kapper, JJ., concur.

* See Employers’ Liability Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 74; Laws of 1921, chap. 121), §2 et seq.— [Rep.

Case Details

Case Name: Donnelly v. Staten Island Shipbuilding Co.

Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date Published: Jun 15, 1923

Citation: 206 A.D. 765

Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.