History
  • No items yet
midpage
Donnelly v. Morris
13 N.Y.S. 427
The Superior Court of the City...
1891
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The plaintiff did not establish any equity upon the motion. The supposed equity was founded upon the application by defendant to the payment of the note of partnership assets, or the defendant’s breach of his agreement to apply those assets to the payment of the note. Either contingency does not create an equity. All of it is that it is inconvenient to ascertain the facts, and to go to Massachusetts to defend the action there. This is not ground of equitable interference. Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Donnelly v. Morris
Court Name: The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo
Date Published: Jan 5, 1891
Citation: 13 N.Y.S. 427
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.