History
  • No items yet
midpage
Donnell v. Miller
133 Mo. App. 693
Mo. Ct. App.
1908
Check Treatment
ELLISON, J.

This is an action of replevin begun in the circuit court, in which the plaintiff recovered judgment in the trial court.

The petition does not allege ownership, either general or special, in the plaintiff, and for that reason is fatally defective. It does allege that plaintiff was “lawfully entitled to the possession of,” etc., but that, it seems, has been held not to be sufficient. [Benedict v. Jones, 60 Mo. App. 219.] That case has since been cited in Dillard v. McClure, 64 Mo. App. 488, and Harmon v. Iden, 88 Mo. App. 314. We must therefore hold *694that defendant’s objections, on that account, should have been sustained. The petition should have been amended.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Donnell v. Miller
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 16, 1908
Citation: 133 Mo. App. 693
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.