Donnell v. CoxDonnell v. Cox
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Per Curiam
Pee CueiaM.
Tbe appellant assigns as error tbe findings of fact by tbe court below. However, tbe assignment is not supported by an excep *260 tion to snob findings, therefore, it is feckless. Worsley v. Rendering Co., 239 N.C. 547, 80 S.E. 2d 467; Wyatt v. Sharp, 239 N.C. 655, 80 S.E. 2d 762. Moreover, when no exception is taken to findings of fact, they are presumed to be supported by the evidence and are binding on appeal. Wyatt v. Sharp, supra, and cases cited therein.
The ruling of the court below is
Affirmed.