History
  • No items yet
midpage
Donaldson v. Benton
20 N.C. 435
N.C.
1839
Check Treatment
Gaston, Judge.

It cannot be contended that Bank notes are a lawful tender, and it is equally plain that parol evidence is not admissible to contradict the written agreement. The opinion of the Judge is so obviously right upon both these points — each of which is fatal to the plaintiff’s recovery— that it necessarily follows that the judgment must be affirmed with costs.

Per Curiam,. ■ Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Donaldson v. Benton
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Dec 15, 1839
Citation: 20 N.C. 435
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.