Donald Rubin Inc. v. SchwartzDonald Rubin Inc. v. Schwartz
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about July 25, 1994, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order limiting disclosure of tax returns and other financial information, and which denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the action as a sanction for failure to comply with prior discovery orders, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this action for damages arising from defendants’ alleged breach of a contract to provide consulting and administrative services, this Court previously found "a reasonable possibility that evidence with respect to [plaintiffs’] mitigation of damages will be relevant at trial” and reversed the IAS Court’s denial of a motion to compel plaintiffs to respond to interrogatories, which included demands for production of tax and other financial information (
The order is appealable as it "affects a substantial right” (CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]; see, e.g., 85th St. Rest. Corp. v Sanders,
The court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order as they failed to establish that the documents were confidential or privileged (see, Liga v Long Is. R. R.,
The court also properly refused to dismiss the action as there was no showing that the default was deliberate, contumacious or a wilful disregard of the prior order (see, Cinelli v Radcliffe,