Gary Don et al., Respondents, v Baruch Singer et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants, et al., Intervenors-Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department
2011
[939 NYS2d 363]
Issues of fact exist on the question of whether the material that plaintiffs provided Singer was confidential (see Ashland Mgt. Inc. v Altair Invs. NA, LLC, 59 AD3d 97, 102 [2008], mod on other grounds 14 NY3d 774 [2010]) and whether Singer used the material that plaintiffs provided.
The claim for lost profits is not unduly speculative in light of plaintiffs’ expert affidavit (see Blinds to Go [US], Inc. v Times Plaza Dev., L.P., 88 AD3d 838, 840 [2011]) and their detailed profit projections.
We have considered defendants’ other contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 31993(U).]
