History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dolfi v. Dolfi
667 So. 2d 409
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1996
|
Check Treatment
ANTOON, Judge.

Roveri Dolfi files this appeal seeking relief from the final judgment of dissolution of marriage, claiming that the trial court abused its discretion in equitably distributing the assets which the parties acquired during the marriage, and in awarding Sandra Dolfi $100 per month permanent periodic alimony. Because the trial court failed to include findings of fact upon which it based the alimony award, and because the alimony award is inconsistent with the court’s finding that Roveri does not have the present ability to pay alimony, we reverse and remand in order for the trial court to reconsider the alimony award in light of section 61.08, Florida Statutes (1993). See Moreno v. Moreno, 606 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). See also O’Neal v. O’Neal, 407 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). In all other respects, the final judgment of dissolution of marriage is affirmed.

AFFIRMED; REVERSED; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Dolfi v. Dolfi
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 12, 1996
Citation: 667 So. 2d 409
Docket Number: No. 94-1946
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.