Dole v. Young

11 Johns. 90 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1814

Per Curiam.

We have not adopted the rule of the English court of K. B. that the plaintiff is out of court if he does' not declare in one year after the defendant's appearance. But, there being no attorney employed in this case, the copy of the declaration and notice of the rule to plead, ought to have been served oii the defendant personally, or by leaving them at his usua place of abode. The proceedings must, therefore, be set aside

Rule granted, ^(a)

(a) See S. P. Cheetham v. Lewis, (5 Caines' Rep. 256.)

Case Details

Case Name: Dole v. Young

Court Name: New York Supreme Court

Date Published: May 15, 1814

Citation: 11 Johns. 90

Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.