History
  • No items yet
midpage
Doig v. Haverly
37 N.Y.S. 455
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1895
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

At the close of the evidence given in the case the parties expressly waived a jury, and submitted the questions of fact and of law to the court. Thereafter findings of fact were mad.e, and a conclusion of law stated. We are of the opinion that the evidence warranted the finding of fact made by the trial judge. The questions of law are clearly and fully discussed in an opinion delivered by the trial judge, which meets with our approval, and we therefore affirm the judgment upon the opinion of the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of PARKER, J., delivered at the circuit.

Case Details

Case Name: Doig v. Haverly
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 26, 1895
Citation: 37 N.Y.S. 455
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.