Doe v. United StatesDoe v. United States
OPINION AND ORDER
This is a class action by current and former Department of Justice attorneys. They claim entitlement to overtime pay or compensatory time pursuant to The Federal Employees Pay Act,
DISCUSSION
For full-time, part-time and intermittent tours of duty, hours of work officially ordered or approved in excess of 40 hours in an administrative workweek, or ... in excess of 8 hours in a day, performed by an employee are overtime work and shall be paid for, except as otherwise provided by this subchapter, at the following rates____
(a) The head of an agency may—
(2) provide that an employee whose rate of basic pay is in excess of the maximum rate of basic pay for GS-10 ... shall be granted compensatory time off ... equal to the amount of time spent in irregular or occasional overtime work instead of being paid for that work undersection 5542 of this title.
The issue here is whether
Jurisdiction is proper in this court where a statute exists that “can fairly be interpreted as mandating compensation by the Federal Government for the damage sustained.” United States v. Testan,
Defendant argues that “because the agency has the option of providing compensatory time, it has the discretion to deny monetary compensation altogether.” Perhaps, but the Agency has not done so. The United States must compensate employees who work overtime in some manner.
CONCLUSION
Notes
. We have already ruled that attorneys paid at the level of GS-15, Step 10 are not entitled to overtime or compensatory time in any circumstances. Doe v. United States,
. The statute requires that the overtime be "ordered or approved.” We do not address that issue here.
. Department of Justice regulations provide a method whereby compensatory time may be liquidated at the overtime rate of pay.