Doe v. Eggleston

146 A. 175 | N.J. | 1929

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, CAMPBELL, McGLENNON, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 8.

For reversal — WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, JJ. 3.