Doe v. Eggleston
106 N.J.L. 565
N.J.
1929
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, CAMPBELL, McGLENNON, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 8.

For reversal — WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, JJ. 3.