Doe v. EgglestonDoe v. Eggleston
May 20, 1929
Versions:146 A. 175106 N.J.L. 5651929 N.J. LEXIS 190
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Kalisch, Campbell, McGlennon, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 8.
For reversal — White, Van Buskiek, Kays, JJ. 3.