midpage

Doe v. EgglestonDoe v. Eggleston

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 20, 1929
Versions:146 A. 175
106 N.J.L. 565
1929 N.J. LEXIS 190
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Kalisch, Campbell, McGlennon, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 8.

For reversal — White, Van Buskiek, Kays, JJ. 3.

Case Details

Case Name: Doe v. Eggleston
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 20, 1929
Citations: 146 A. 175; 106 N.J.L. 565; 1929 N.J. LEXIS 190
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In