History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dodge v. Greeley
31 Me. 343
Me.
1850
Check Treatment
Wells, J., orally.

The general principle is that, in a conditional contract, if there be but a partial performance by one party, the other may retract. The plaintiff failed as to his part, and cannot complain of the erasure. He had no right to be benefited by his own wrong.

There was nothing illegal in withholding the requested instructions. An agreement may, without direct- and specific terms, embrace all that the request contemplated. The right to erase might be implied from the nature of the transaction.

Whether the deposition was wrongfully admitted, need not be decided; because its contents had no tendency to prove the issue for the defendant. A party has no ground of complaint, if he has not been injured.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Dodge v. Greeley
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1850
Citation: 31 Me. 343
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.