History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dodd v. COPELAND
52 N.J. 537
| N.J. | 1968
|
Check Treatment
52 N.J. 537 (1968)
247 A.2d 129

WILLIAM DODD, EDWARD DODD, AND MARION ELIZABETH DODD, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, CROSS-APPELLANTS,
v.
GEORGE R. COPELAND, GEORGE D. COPELAND, AND SAMUEL J. COX, DEFENDANTS, SAMUEL J. COX AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND, APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 7, 1968.
Decided November 4, 1968.

Mr. Bruce D. Herrigel argued the cause for appellants, cross-respondents (Messrs. Herrigel and Herrigel, attorneys).

Mr. John J. Trombadore argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents, cross-appellants (Messrs. Trombadore and Trombadore, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons given in the majority opinion, 99 N.J. Super. 481 (1968).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Dodd v. COPELAND
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 4, 1968
Citation: 52 N.J. 537
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.