History
  • No items yet
midpage
D'la Rosa v. Rodriguez
460 So. 2d 567
Fla.
1984
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and briefs of counsel we are convinced that the trial court did not err in entering judgment pursuant to a jury verdict which appellants contend included inconsistent findings. We find no merit in this contention. The record demonstrates that the answers provided by the jury on the special interrogatory verdict are all that are necessary to properly determine liability and damages as between the parties. No reversible error having been demonstrated, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: D'la Rosa v. Rodriguez
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Dec 18, 1984
Citation: 460 So. 2d 567
Docket Number: No. 84-618
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.