midpage

Dixson v. StateDixson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
May 30, 2001
No. 3D00-2663
Versions:785 So. 2d 744
2001 WL 579832
2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rhodes v. State, 701 So.2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(Neither defense attorney nor trial court is required to warn defendant of sentence-enhancing consequences that defendant’s plea will have as to any future crimes defendant may commit; neither trial court nor defense counsel has duty to anticipate defendant’s recidivism.)

Case Details

Case Name: Dixson v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 30, 2001
Citations: 785 So. 2d 744; 2001 WL 579832; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485; No. 3D00-2663
Docket Number: No. 3D00-2663
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In