Dixson v. State, 785 So. 2d 744

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rhodes v. State, 701 So.2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(Neither defense attorney nor trial court is required to warn defendant of sentence-enhancing consequences that defendant’s plea will have as to any future crimes defendant may commit; neither trial court nor defense counsel has duty to anticipate defendant’s recidivism.)

Case Details

Case Name: Dixson v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: May 30, 2001

Citations: 785 So. 2d 744; 2001 WL 579832; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485; No. 3D00-2663

Docket Number: No. 3D00-2663

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.