Dixon v. State

Nov 27, 1935
25282
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Broyles
Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was eonvieted of possessing whisky. The evidence amply authorized the verdict. The special grounds of the motion for new trial, not having been argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Querry, JJ., concur.