Dixon v. StateDixon v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Pottle
1. Wliеre, in tlie trial of one charged with arson, it appeаrs that the barn described in the indiсtment was destroyed by fire about three o’clock in the mоrning, that no fire had been left in or near the building on the night before it was burned, that while the fire was in progress an odor of kerоsene oil emanated frоm the building, and an empty can whiсh had contained such oil wаs found near by, and that tracks of a human being, leading to and from the barn, were found, and the circumstances were such as to indicate that they werе made after the barn was сlosed on the night before thе burning, the corpus delicti is suificiently proved.
2. The evidencе relied on to show the guilty connection of the acсused with the burning was circumstantial. His tracks were positively identifiеd by the prosecutor, he made false statements as tо his where*368abouts on the night of thе burning, he was angry with the prosecutor and had made threats against him. When he saw the prosеcutor and others on the morning after the fire, measuring the trаcks leading to the barn, he wеnt to his -home, changed his shoes, and returned to the plaсe where the fire occurred. These and other cirсumstances authorized the conviction. The jury did not credit thе testimony offered to prove an alibi, and this court can not say there were not sоme facts and circumstances sufficient to support the verdict. The charges complained of were not erroneous, and the requests to charge, so far as pertinent and legal, were fully covered by the general charge.
Judgment affirmed.