History
  • No items yet
midpage
167 So. 349
Ala.
1936
BOULDIN, Justice.

This court has fully considered the several grounds upon which the constitutionality of the act in question is assailed. They are fully treated and correctly decided in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. We see no occasion for further discussion of these questions on our part.

Touching the insistence here made that this act does not in terms repeal certain sections of the general law, it is sufficient to say: Being an original and not an amendatory act, it repeals, in the counties designated, such provisions of existing law as 'are in direct conflict therewith. *151 This, under the well-known rule that the last expression of the legislative will is the law.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER .and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Dixon v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Apr 9, 1936
Citations: 167 So. 349; 232 Ala. 150; 1936 Ala. LEXIS 178; 6 Div. 924.
Docket Number: 6 Div. 924.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Dixon v. State, 167 So. 349