Dixon v. Goethals
242 U.S. 616
SCOTUS
1916
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of McCollum v. Eager, 2 How. 61; Thomas v. Wooldridge, 23 Wall. 283; Buffington v. Harvey, 95 U. S. 99; Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collander Co., 228 U. S. 339, 346. Mr. Benjamin T. Waldo and Mr. Challen B. Ellis for the appellants. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the appellees.