History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dixon v. Eastern State Construction Co.
39 A.D.3d 230
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2007
|
Check Treatment

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered July 24, 2006, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to reinstate the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff demonstrated a sufficient excuse for the delay, in that he was relying on his prior counsel’s misrepresentations that the matter was progressing (see Pagan v Estate of Anglero, *23122 AD3d 285 [2005]). Plaintiff demonstrated he had a sufficiently meritorious cause of action to warrant going forward. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Marlow, Williams and Catterson, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Dixon v. Eastern State Construction Co.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 3, 2007
Citation: 39 A.D.3d 230
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.