History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dixon v. Eastern State Construction Co.
39 A.D.3d 230
N.Y. App. Div.
2007
Check Treatment

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered July 24, 2006, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to reinstate the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff demonstrated a sufficient excuse for the delay, in that he was relying on his prior counsel’s misrepresentations that the matter was progressing (see Pagan v Estate of Anglero, *23122 AD3d 285 [2005]). Plaintiff demonstrated he had a sufficiently meritorious cause of action to warrant going forward. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Marlow, Williams and Catterson, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Dixon v. Eastern State Construction Co.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 3, 2007
Citation: 39 A.D.3d 230
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.