History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States
298 U.S. 645
SCOTUS
1936
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss the certificate is granted and the certificate is dismissed. Jewell v. Knight, 123 U. S. 426, 433; Cross v. Evans, 167 U. S. 60, 63; B. & O. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 215. U. S. 216, 221; United States v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 66; Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. First National Bank of Dublin, 290 U. S. 594; Mantle Lamp Co. v. Aluminum Products Co., 297 U. S. 638; Smith, Collector v. Ajax Pipe Line Co., ante, p. 641. Solicitor General Reed for the United States in support of the motion. Messrs. Charles P. Taft and Robert A. Taft for Dixie Terminal Co.

Case Details

Case Name: Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 1, 1936
Citation: 298 U.S. 645
Docket Number: No. 967
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.